The Albie Collection

Equality | The Van Heerden Case

Van Heerden Case: Constitutional Court Press Summary

Van Heerden Case: Abridged Judgment

Van Heerden Case: Constitutional Court Full Judgment

Van Heerden Case: Video Transcript

Video Chapters

- A More Just Society Through Equality Jurisprudence
- What Form Of Discrimination Is It?
- They Disagree With Each Other; I Agree With Them Both
- ‘If You Can’t See That I’m Black, You Don’t See Me’
- Proportionality - A Balancing Of Fairness
- Different Routes To The Same Conclusion

The Van Heerden Case

2004

Minister of Finance and Other v Van Heerden 

Enhanced pension funds

Was the creation of enhanced pension rights for members of South Africa's new democratically elected parliament, who were overwhelmingly black, discriminatory against a member of the old racist parliament who happened to be white and continued to receive lower pension rates? Justice Moseneke said no, the Constitution allowed for redress for sections of the population previously disadvantaged on grounds of race and gender. Justice Mokgoro disagreed with this reasoning, saying that she agreed with the outcome but on the basis that the discrimination was not unfair. Justice Sachs said that although they disagreed with each other, he agreed with them both and that these were two different constitutional pathways to reach the same constitutionally fair result.

Doc #TAC_C_03_02_04_01
The link has been copied to your clipboard.