The Albie Collection

Sexual Orientation and the Right to be Different | The Fourie Case

Fourie Case: Constitutional Court Press Summary

Fourie Case: Abridged Judgment

Fourie Case: Constitutional Court Full Judgment

Fourie Case: Video Transcript

Video Chapters

- The right of same-sex couples to marry
- Coexistence between the sacred and the secular
- Changing the discourse
- The idea of co-existence
- The court can't become become interpreters of scripture
- Marching, meeting, dilemmas and diversity
- The right to be who you are
- A solomonian judgment
- 'To Amy and Jean's marriage'

The Fourie Case

2005

Minister of Home Affairs and Another v Fourie and Another; Lesbian and Gay Equality Project and Others v Minister

The right of same-sex couples to marry

The first big issue in this case was whether same sex couples had the right to say ‘I marry you’ or whether they were simply entitled to have their relationships regulated by law as civil unions. The second was, if they had the right to use the ‘M’ word [Marriage], should that right start immediately by the Court itself writing the gender-neutral word ‘spouse’ into the Marriage Act? Or should Parliament be given a year to

Doc #TAC_C_03_04_
The link has been copied to your clipboard.