The Albie Collection

Miscellaneous | The Democratic Alliance Case

Democratic Alliance Case: Abridged Judgment

Democratic Alliance Case: Constitutional Court Full Judgment

Democratic Alliance Case: Video Transcript

Video Chapters

- Contemplating a pluralistic democracy
- The structures act at municipal level
- Multi-party mayor or executive mayor?
- Multiple voices in the deliberative process
- The importance of participatory democracy and deliberation
- Participatory democracy strengthens formal democracy

The Democratic Alliance Case

2002

Democratic Alliance and Another v Masondo NO and Another

Deliberative democracy in local government

The issue in this case was whether the Mayoral Council in local government should be treated as a council committee and have a balanced membership representing the diversity of council members. The majority judgment by Deputy Chief Justice Langa said no. In a concurring judgment, Justice Sachs said that even if the Mayoral Council was headed by a strong executive mayor, and made up of his supporters and allies, it would have to function in a balanced way, giving voice to all the currents represented in the council. He observed that the dialogical nature of deliberative democracy had its roots both in international democratic practice and indigenous African tradition. It had been through dialogue and sensible accommodation on an inclusive and principled basis that the Constitution itself had emerged. It would accordingly be perverse to construe its terms in a way that belied or minimised the importance of the very inclusive processes that had led to its adoption and sustained its legitimacy.

Doc #TAC_C_03_20_01_01
The link has been copied to your clipboard.