The Albie Collection

Gender Justice | The Jordan Case

Jordan Case: Constitutional Court Press Summary

Jordan Case: Abridged Judgment

Jordan Case: Constitutional Court Full Judgment

Jordan Case: Video Transcript

Video Chapters

- Is criminalising the offering of sex for reward an invasion of the right to privacy?
- Two strong, conflicting arguments
- Gender, privacy and re-inforced stereotypes
- The decriminalisation of sex work in open democratic societies
- It's for parliament to decide
- Resolving the two positionalities of feminism

The Jordan Case

2002

S v Jordan and Others (Sex Workers Education and Advocacy Task Force and Others as Amici Curiae)

The decriminalisation of sex workers

The law stated that anyone who provided sex for reward was guilty of a criminal offence. This law was challenged on the basis that it invaded the privacy rights of sex workers and also discriminated unfairly against them as women. The majority of the Court rejected both these challenges. In a joint dissent, Justices Sachs and O’Regan accepted that the women attenuated their privacy rights by offering their bodies to the

Doc #TAC_C_03_03_03_01
The link has been copied to your clipboard.