The Albie Collection

The Rights of Vulnerable Groups | The S v M Case

S v M Case: Constitutional Court Press Summary

S v M Case: Abridged Judgment

S v M Case: Constitutional Court Full Judgment

S v M Case: Video Transcript

Video Chapters

- The best interests of the child
- How to get a case heard in the constitutional court
- 'Tell me what you think'
- The case is set down
- Restorative justice, ubuntu and our bill of rights
- The right of a child to grow up as a child
- Cited around the world

The S v M Case

2007

S v M

The interests of the child in the imprisonment of a primary caregiver

M was a compulsive credit card fraudster. After being convicted of purchasing goods in a number of stores knowing full well she lacked the credit to pay for them, she was given a suspended prison sentence. She then committed the crimes again and while out on bail continued to do so for a third time. Finding herself faced with time in prison, she argued that this would separate her from her children for whom she was the only caregiver. The magistrate felt that she should have thought about her children before she committed the offences, and she ended up having to serve two years in prison. In the Constitutional Court all the Judges agreed that what was at stake was not her rights but the rights of the children. The majority judgment written by Justice Sachs used social work reports together with restorative justice principles of keeping her out of jail, subject to her paying back the money, receiving counselling for compulsive behaviour, and undertaking appropriate forms of community service.

Doc #TAC_C_03_08_05_01
The link has been copied to your clipboard.