The Albie Collection

Socio-Economic Rights | The Port Elizabeth Municipality Case

Port Elizabeth Municipality Case: Abridged Judgment

Port Elizabeth Municipality Case: Constitutional Court Full Judgment

Port Elizabeth Municipality Case: Video Transcript

Video Chapters

- A very different case
- Facing the facts
- What the constitution says
- Do I need to resign?
- Arbitrary deprivation of property
- Meaningful engagement

The Port Elizabeth Municipality Case

2004

Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers

Housing – occupation of private property

Justice Sachs explains how he considered resigning from the Court rather than fulfil his oath to uphold the law in support of an order requiring black families to take down their shelters and move from vacant land owned by white families in an upmarket adjacent suburb. However, stating that the Bill of Rights was nothing but Ubuntu writ large, he counterposed the occupants’ rights to housing to the owners’ rights to property, he introduced the concept of meaningful engagement in the form of mediation to balance out the competing interests in a just and equitable way. Since mediation hadn’t been tried, eviction without providing alternative accommodation was not just and equitable. Justice Sachs points out how the concept of meaningful engagement between the parties in order to find the fairest and most efficacious outcome was later picked up and developed by Justice Yacoob in the Olivia Mansions case.

Doc #TAC_C_03_06_04_01
The link has been copied to your clipboard.